During my own search for prior art, I discovered a web page that describes one of my claims, but there is a link to a different website in the text that somewhat describes my second claim.
Can this first webpage be used as a single reference that fully anticipates a claim or does the link qualify as a second reference, thus no single reference fullly anticipates the claim?
Thanks for you help
In order to understand it well it is must be noted that a single document rule as opposed to double document is a technical way to determine lack of novelty as opposed to lack of inventive step or obviousness.
If both documents are likely to be read together by a person skilled in the art it is considered not new and certainly obvious.